by Otter » Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:26 pm
by ginat » Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:49 pm
by northswell » Tue Apr 17, 2007 7:59 pm
by Real Pol » Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:25 pm
by Milo » Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:28 pm
by ^*^BATMAN^*^ » Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:35 pm
by hawaiiSUCKSexceptsurf » Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:26 pm
by RJD » Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:40 pm
by Stone Fox » Tue Apr 17, 2007 11:15 pm
^*^BATMAN^*^ wrote:Elusive Fox wrote:(he was in British Para regiment,
by Otter » Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:16 am
by RJD » Wed Apr 18, 2007 12:34 am
Otter wrote:Sorry lads, our Constitution guarantees our rights to keep and bear arms. Sorry you don't approve. Oh well.
by ^*^BATMAN^*^ » Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:18 am
RJD wrote:Otter wrote:Sorry lads, our Constitution guarantees our rights to keep and bear arms. Sorry you don't approve. Oh well.
That's a seriously dubious claim and then some.
But its not about us approving. Its about 30,000 Americans being killed a year.
Even if your constitution is interpreted correctly(big stretch) don't you think its about time you rethought it, this is one of those cases where the rights of the individual should give way for the betterment of the state as a whole.
by tomcat360 » Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:23 am
RJD wrote:If everyone was armed he may still have killed most or all of those & then you'd have a school full of tooled up students scared out of their minds pointing guns at a whole load of tooled up students. And no one knowing who was the bad guy.
by Otter » Wed Apr 18, 2007 2:52 am
RJD wrote:Otter wrote:Sorry lads, our Constitution guarantees our rights to keep and bear arms. Sorry you don't approve. Oh well.
That's a seriously dubious claim and then some.
But its not about us approving. Its about 30,000 Americans being killed a year.
Even if your constitution is interpreted correctly(big stretch) don't you think its about time you rethought it, this is one of those cases where the rights of the individual should give way for the betterment of the state as a whole.
by RJD » Wed Apr 18, 2007 4:11 am
^*^BATMAN^*^ wrote:
Eh, this is something that has been going on for ever though. Same thing now where some states are trying to make wearing a helmet while on a bike manditory.
Otter wrote:"Seriously dubious?" I'm not sure I understand what you mean by this.
Otter wrote:Is it that the amendment should be modified to reflect "no hand guns" or are rifles and shotguns OK? Or should the U.S. completely disarm it's citizens, like Hitler and Stalin did?
by paulS » Wed Apr 18, 2007 7:34 am
by hawaiiSUCKSexceptsurf » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:07 am
tomcat360 wrote:RJD wrote:
That group is completely radical in their beliefs. It should be known that that is NOT the American mentallity towards this subject.
by hawaiiSUCKSexceptsurf » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:09 am
Elusive Fox wrote:Speaking of Wierd Americans, whatever happened to mr "aspensucksexceptforsnowboarding" ?
We haven't heard from him in a while...
by hawaiiSUCKSexceptsurf » Wed Apr 18, 2007 10:28 am
by Stone Fox » Wed Apr 18, 2007 11:44 am
hawaiiSUCKSexceptsurf wrote:Elusive Fox wrote:Speaking of Wierd Americans, whatever happened to mr "aspensucksexceptforsnowboarding" ?
We haven't heard from him in a while...
ive been busy and plus this board has been pretty dull lately by my tastes.
14 hours ago by JamesHsouthaus5 comments
3 days ago by Kulharin3 comments
13 days ago by Swimmy Tim5 comments
13 days ago by BaNZ3 comments
19 days ago by BoMan6 comments
22 days ago by hannaconner5 comments
1 month ago by BaNZ4 comments
1 month ago by HaoleKook4 comments