by surfin_daddy » Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:03 am
by essex sucks » Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:15 am
by drowningbitbybit » Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:15 am
by surfin_daddy » Fri Jan 19, 2007 11:47 am
drowningbitbybit wrote:'more like 'mucking around with one that already works'
by essex sucks » Fri Jan 19, 2007 12:02 pm
by Stone Fox » Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:32 pm
by drowningbitbybit » Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:38 pm
essex sucks wrote:they said it on the radio that they where going too put the a new surf reef in at boscombe and that they wanted to have at least 10 000 surfer visit it a year
by essex sucks » Fri Jan 19, 2007 1:39 pm
by surfin_daddy » Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:46 pm
by surfin_daddy » Tue Jan 23, 2007 11:52 pm
drowningbitbybit wrote:essex sucks wrote:they said it on the radio that they where going too put the a new surf reef in at boscombe and that they wanted to have at least 10 000 surfer visit it a year
Ha ha ha.
Let's just think about that... 10,000 surfers a year, thats about 30 (different) surfers every day. Let's say, charitably, that bournemouth works one day in ten - thats now 300 surfers on that reef.
More realistically, it wont work all summer, so now lets say 500 surfers on it every time it works...
Still want to surf it....?![]()
by xswind » Fri Jan 26, 2007 5:53 pm
surfin_daddy wrote:i would like to hear libbys views on this subject. cause this is screwing with the eco system big time, what kinda damage is this gonna cause long term???
by bluesnowcone » Fri Jan 26, 2007 8:46 pm
by Sar » Sat Jan 27, 2007 12:30 am
2 hours ago by Slindenkohl3 comments
17 hours ago by JamesHsouthaus7 comments
4 days ago by Kulharin3 comments
14 days ago by Swimmy Tim5 comments
14 days ago by BaNZ3 comments
20 days ago by BoMan6 comments
23 days ago by hannaconner5 comments
1 month ago by BaNZ4 comments