Surfer Babe of the Day

Chat about anything non surfing related.

Postby surf patrol » Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:05 am

Let's not let this post get out of hand. Here are a couple of guidelines.

> No see-through.
> Full body only - no butt only closeups etc.
> Keep them tasteful.
> Try to keep it to one girl per day.
> Remember, it's got to be viewed by everyone.

(We don't seem to have any problems with the hunk of the day post - maybe it's a guy thing :roll:)
User avatar
surf patrol
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3973
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:26 am

Postby gulfsurfer » Sun Apr 03, 2005 6:08 am

but theres butt only shots in all surf mags. why do we need all these guidlines? i dont think its getting out of hand.
gulfsurfer
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1058
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: TEXAS!!!!!

Postby Broosta » Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:09 am

so your married to porn star then broosta :D


She only 'works' with other laydeez so that doesn't count :lol: !

<edit> we don't need images from prnstars.net & bustygirls - try and keep them tasteful. SP</edit>


Hmmm not really sure what difference it makes as to the source of the jpeg as long as its within certain parameters of taste :? .




Look you've made her sulk now :lol: .

Image
User avatar
Broosta
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1028
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:26 pm
Location: East coast uk

Postby rctkj » Sun Apr 03, 2005 4:43 pm

"GUIDELINES" WTF????? You suck! Just let it be.
rctkj
Surfer
 
Posts: 63
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Dec 07, 2004 6:05 pm
Location: Oxnard California

Postby gulfsurfer » Sun Apr 03, 2005 5:50 pm

ya bro, just leave it unless its porn or something (which it hasnt been). as weird as kids are these days i think most parents would be relieved if they saw their son looking at girls in bikinis.
gulfsurfer
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1058
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: TEXAS!!!!!

Postby gulfsurfer » Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:41 am

I just saw this "guideline" and think its retarded.
Try to keep it to one girl per day.


why cant we have more then one??? it doesnt hurt nething

Image
gulfsurfer
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1058
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: TEXAS!!!!!

Postby deathfrog » Mon Apr 04, 2005 1:58 am

maybe because the title of the thread is "babe of the day"
User avatar
deathfrog
SW Pro
 
Posts: 890
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:50 pm
Location: texas

Postby gulfsurfer » Mon Apr 04, 2005 2:00 am

i didnt title it that, when i made this topic i put,
"This BB is dead, lets spice it up a bit"
one of the mods changed it to babe of the day.

i still cant understand why everyone gets bent out of shape when people post pictures of girls in bikinis, its pretty stupid if you ask me.
gulfsurfer
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1058
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: TEXAS!!!!!

Postby deathfrog » Mon Apr 04, 2005 3:32 am

Even though you didn't do it it's still the title, but remember the mods made the rules too.
User avatar
deathfrog
SW Pro
 
Posts: 890
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 9:50 pm
Location: texas

Postby saffasurfer7 » Mon Apr 04, 2005 8:24 am

i still cant understand why everyone gets bent out of shape when people post pictures of girls in bikinis, its pretty stupid if you ask me.




I'm not taking sides with anyone here but I can see how the moderator's may be a bit concerned. If these girls were just girls in bikinis then fair enough. But to be honest, some of them wouldn't look out of place on a porn site. If they were modelling bikinis they'd just be posing naturally. But the pose says it all. Their facial expressions practically all look mid-orgasm and a lot of the shots are taken from behind.

If I wanted to I could have put some really borderline pics up on the hunk of the day site but I'd rather not offend anyone so chose not to.
saffasurfer7
Local Hero
 
Posts: 219
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:16 pm
Location: Newcastle upon Tyne, England

Postby surf patrol » Mon Apr 04, 2005 9:16 am

saffasurfer7 wrote:But to be honest, some of them wouldn't look out of place on a porn site.

Some of the pictures removed were were from porn sites.

saffasurfer7 wrote:If I wanted to I could have put some really borderline pics up on the hunk of the day site but I'd rather not offend anyone so chose not to.

Exactly saffasurfer7 - is this so hard to understand?

Let's not get too wound up over this thread. Try to remember this is a surfing site and surfing chat, info and insight is much more relevant.
User avatar
surf patrol
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3973
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2003 3:26 am

Postby gulfsurfer » Mon Apr 04, 2005 12:50 pm

alright......
gulfsurfer
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1058
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: TEXAS!!!!!

Postby Broosta » Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:11 am

What happened to the picture in my last post :? ? I can't see it any more.
User avatar
Broosta
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1028
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 8:26 pm
Location: East coast uk

Postby Phil » Tue Apr 05, 2005 8:42 am

shes still there mate
User avatar
Phil
Big Wave Master
 
Posts: 2156
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: soon to be dropping in on DBBB

Postby gulfsurfer » Tue Apr 05, 2005 10:40 pm

Try to remember this is a surfing site and surfing chat, info and insight is much more relevant.


I got all mine from a SURFING SITE.

boy i sure hope noone gets offended today...

Image
gulfsurfer
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1058
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sun Sep 19, 2004 5:48 pm
Location: TEXAS!!!!!

Postby Brent » Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:26 am

Woah...I'm offended by that one. Deeeeeply offended :-)))
Brent
SW Pro
 
Posts: 632
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2004 10:07 am
Location: Mount Maunganui, New Zealand

Postby Phil » Wed Apr 06, 2005 9:06 am

not bad shame shes got fake tits
User avatar
Phil
Big Wave Master
 
Posts: 2156
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2004 8:55 pm
Location: soon to be dropping in on DBBB

Postby PapaW » Wed Apr 06, 2005 1:56 pm

I was gonna say the same phil... Personally I prefer natural for deffo, and i'm quite partial to the pettite on occasion ;)

You can look at it two ways with natural size:

* More than a Handfull is a waste
or
*More than a handfull is a challange![/list]
User avatar
PapaW
Surf God
 
Posts: 3551
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu May 13, 2004 12:48 pm
Location: Causeway Coast, N. Ireland

Postby deadite » Wed Apr 06, 2005 10:34 pm

PapaWoolacombe wrote:I was gonna say the same phil... Personally I prefer natural for deffo, and i'm quite partial to the pettite on occasion ;)

You can look at it two ways with natural size:

* More than a Handfull is a waste
or
*More than a handfull is a challange![/list]

Or, more than a handfull is a pillow. :lol:
deadite
Local Hero
 
Posts: 127
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Nov 20, 2004 12:32 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Postby k mac » Thu Apr 07, 2005 9:54 am

Or, more than a handfull is a pillow
only if you have an extremely small head that is. :D
k mac
SW Pro
 
Posts: 730
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: cornwall or manchester/england

PreviousNext

Similar topics

Return to General Chat