A few pics (unfortunately not of surfing)

Chat about anything non surfing related.

A few pics (unfortunately not of surfing)

Postby Jimi » Thu May 17, 2007 8:33 am

Just got a new lense for my camera... tell me what you think.

Image

Image

Image
User avatar
Jimi
SW Pro
 
Posts: 698
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:53 am
Location: Cronulla Sydney Australia

Postby soops » Thu May 17, 2007 9:29 am

Really nice colours on that first one mate!
How far away were you when taking those?
User avatar
soops
Local Hero
 
Posts: 381
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2007 11:45 am
Location: Sleepy Exeter

Postby Bewilderbeast » Thu May 17, 2007 10:56 am

Nice pics man. 8)

What camera are you using?
User avatar
Bewilderbeast
Local Hero
 
Posts: 367
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:11 pm
Location: About to go into supernag mode!

Postby Jimi » Thu May 17, 2007 11:37 am

In the 1st one, I was about 15ft away, but on the others I was about 20ft away from the birds... I was surprised at the colours too, as they were taken in low-ish light.

Using a Canon EOS 400D (Rebel XTi) with a 75-300mm Canon telephoto lense.
User avatar
Jimi
SW Pro
 
Posts: 698
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:53 am
Location: Cronulla Sydney Australia

Postby thaya » Thu May 17, 2007 6:38 pm

i really like that first one...like soops said, the colours are amazing.
User avatar
thaya
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1432
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Feb 21, 2006 12:14 pm
Location: still in hospital (in newcastle)

Postby RJD » Thu May 17, 2007 9:25 pm

Want me to be harsh?

Lotta CA on the 2/3rd, 1st is soft, got the exif data for it (shutter speed/apature)? Bokeh is nice & creamy though & colour/contrast is better than the 75-300 I borrowed a whole ago.

I'm guessing (due to the noise) you were shooting wide open at relativly long shutter speeds too. Have fun with it, should be great for surf photo's.
RJD
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1373
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Postby Jimi » Sat May 19, 2007 2:55 am

RJD wrote:I'm guessing (due to the noise) you were shooting wide open at relativly long shutter speeds too. Have fun with it, should be great for surf photo's.


Yeh, spot on, with iso 1600... fading light makes it very tricky to get good clean photos of subjects (especially without using the tripod).

In the 1st photo there was more light, and I got the iso to 800, aperture ~5 shutter ~ 1/200th, but the 2nd and 3rd photos were too dark for those settings, and I upped the ISO to 1600, and kept the rest similar.

Thanks for the comments, and I'll try to get some surf photos up soon
:D
User avatar
Jimi
SW Pro
 
Posts: 698
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:53 am
Location: Cronulla Sydney Australia

Postby tomcat360 » Mon May 21, 2007 2:08 pm

What did you have the metering set to?

Remember if your only two options are to either underexpose or have a blurry photo due to too much movement, go with under exposure, because you can rescue the photo in photoshop, but with a blurry photo nothing can be done.

What setting did you have the camera set to? I shoot almost everything on Av when the lighting is changing a lot on me. Isolates the focal point and allows for the fastest shutter speed.
User avatar
tomcat360
Surfing Legend
 
Posts: 2369
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed May 25, 2005 4:33 pm
Location: Lake Atlantic (VA, USA)

Postby RJD » Mon May 21, 2007 8:43 pm

Shoot raw and set the exposure compensation to -1 or -2 EV to 'fake' extra ISO speed if you cant get the shutter fast enough with ISO1600.

Its all the 30D does anyhow, and RAW allows you to claw back some of that dark area info.
RJD
SW Pro
 
Posts: 1373
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Dec 05, 2005 7:37 pm
Location: Christchurch, New Zealand

Postby Jimi » Tue May 22, 2007 11:43 am

Center weighted metering, which is usually pretty good, shot in Av mode (I also like this because it allows you to keep the focal field constant).

I think the RAW format with underexposure option is a very good call RJD.

I haven't had much of a play with raw files, and I usually don't underexpose because in jpg format the shadows lose detail, even after photoshop's magic.

I'm gonna have to get used to shooting everything in RAW. Seems to be the way of the future.
User avatar
Jimi
SW Pro
 
Posts: 698
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:53 am
Location: Cronulla Sydney Australia

Postby Dr Rev » Tue May 22, 2007 4:27 pm

Image


Woody who comes to my garden most mornings, photo taken with camera phone ! :D
User avatar
Dr Rev
Big Wave Master
 
Posts: 1797
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue May 16, 2006 12:01 pm
Location: Bringing Peace and Humour to the Forum


Similar topics

Return to General Chat