by Jimi » Thu Apr 19, 2007 1:51 pm
Just throwing something out there...
My question is not of gun laws, as he was planning the killings and definately could have gotten the guns illegally if he wanted. It was simply that it was easier for him to walk into a shop and buy them than to get them on the black market, but either way, he would have got them regardless of laws.
Guns or not, I'm sure we agree he was seriously mentally unbalanced. I am just so deeply saddened that nobody took into consideration his mental health in the months and (according to the media) years prior to this tragic event. If just a few people tried to make a difference to this loner/outcast/wierdo things may have turned out differently.
It has been reported that he was sent to a psychologist while at VT, but the psychologist was supposed to make him conform to the expectations of university, ie. he was told to stop writing macabre poems about death of students.
There has been nothing reported by the media (as yet) to suggest that the psychologist was given sufficient time to address his clearly disturbed mental state, and nor is there anything to suggest the university was making progress with his clear separation and dislike for his peers.
His only obvious support was from his english lecturer, who sought assistance from psychologists and colleagues to rectify his antisocial behaviour, yet little was done, other than the police being called.
The only outcome was that the police regretted to say that he could not be "forced" to go to a mental health institution because he had not directly threatened anybody, even though he appeared suicidal and unstable.
I feel that in this situation, while it may not have made a difference, a little compassion (from trained mental health workers) toward this outcast may have actually steered him toward rehabilitation rather than a suicidal rampage.
I get the feeling that he had been on a very fine line for some time before this event, and may have been pushed over the edge by the neglectful nature of his surroundings.
I sincerely hope that my interpretation has not caused anyone any undue grief, as this is not my intention. I know that I could potentially offend those who have suffered in this horrific situation, especially if I appear sympathetic toward a killer, and I hereby point out that I am merely looking at a possible way (in future) of saving 33 people, rather than only the 32 innocent victims of this tragedy.