Page 1 of 1

the dark sucker theory!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 9:56 am
by O_Danny_Boy
The Dark Sucker Theory



For years, it has been believed that electric bulbs emit light, but recent information has proved otherwise. Electric bulbs do NOT emit light; they suck dark. Thus, we should call these bulbs Dark Suckers.

The Dark Sucker Theory and the existence of dark suckers prove that dark has mass and is heavier than light.

First, the basis of the Dark Sucker Theory is that electric bulbs suck dark. For example, take the Dark Sucker in the room you are in. There is much less dark right next to it than there is elsewhere in the room. The larger the Dark Sucker, the greater its capacity to suck dark. For instance, the Dark Suckers in an outdoor parking lot have a much greater capacity to suck dark than the ones in this room.

And, as with all things, Dark Suckers don’t last forever. Once they are full of dark, they can no longer suck. This is proven by the dark spot on a full Dark Sucker.

A candle is a primitive Dark Sucker. A new candle has a white wick. You can see that after the first use, the wick has turned black, representing all the dark that has been sucked into it. If you put a pencil next to the wick of an operating candle, it will turn black. This is because it got in the way of the dark flowing into the candle. One of the disadvantages of these primitive Dark Suckers is their limited range.

There are also portable Dark Suckers. In these, the bulbs can’t handle all the dark by themselves and must be aided by a Dark Storage Unit. When the Dark Storage Unit is full, it must be either emptied or replaced before the portable Dark Sucker can operate again.

Dark has mass. When dark goes into a Dark Sucker, friction from the mass generates heat. Thus, it is not wise to touch an operating Dark Sucker. Candles present a special problem as the mass must travel into a solid wick instead of through clear glass. This generates a great amount of heat and therefore it is very unwise to touch an operating candle.

Also, dark is heavier than light. If you were to swim just below the surface of the ocean, you would see a lot of light, if you were to slowly swim deeper and deeper, you would notice it getting darker and darker. When you get really deep, you would be in total darkness. This is because the heavier dark sinks to the bottom of the ocean and the lighter light floats at the top. This is why it is called “light.”

Finally, we must prove that dark is faster than light. If you were to stand in a lit room in front of a closed, dark closet, and slowly open the closet door, you would see the light slowly enter the closet. But, since dark is so fast, you would not be able to see the dark leave the closet.





So, next time you see an electric bulb, remember that it really is a Dark Sucker!

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:14 am
by essex sucks
ok then what ever you say, sounds cool lol

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:32 am
by Dr Rev
Has someone been smoking summik ? :wink: :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 10:35 am
by CheeZee
lmfao... i sincerely hope you have been smoking summmat , because that is the biggest pile of' i have ever read :lol: :wink: ...good on ya , made my coffee reach at least five yards :mrgreen:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 11:51 am
by Dec
It's kind of like the heat/energy theory whatchmacallit. There is no such thing as cold..it's just less heat. For example if you hold an ice cube it just sucks out the heat from your hand, making it appear colder...but it isn't...you just have less energy.



But yes...i think we both have been smoking something :roll: :lol:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:02 pm
by pault
Yeah endo and exothermic reactions.

There are theories then there is just saying something for attention :roll:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:22 pm
by drowningbitbybit
pault wrote:There are theories then there is just saying something for attention :roll:


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Must remember that one

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:27 pm
by O_Danny_Boy
id love to tkae credit for writing it but i found it at mavsurfer.com and thought it was quite the read :lol:


you have to admit its intersting stuff

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:36 pm
by CheeZee
it is actually quite interesting huh .. the sort of twaddle i would come out with in fact .. so all good my man :rock: :unuts: :mrgreen:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:37 pm
by CheeZee
There are theories then there is just saying something for attention
...there are so many uses for this statement , may we borrow it Pault ?! :wink:

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 1:43 pm
by pault
Heck yeah you can borrow it, for once I said something usefull :lol:

It's like the theory that when we move, it is not us moving within our environment, it's our environment that moves around us.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:10 pm
by O_Danny_Boy
wow :shock:

didnt think it would have caused so much philosophying(spelling eh?)

i liken myself to Descartes

"i think so therefore i am"

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 2:42 pm
by chris fixxy
this is a load of rubbish.

the absence of dark isnt neccesarily light, its just the absence of dark.

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:06 pm
by O_Danny_Boy
did you take it seriously?

PostPosted: Fri Mar 23, 2007 3:14 pm
by chris fixxy
O_Danny_Boy wrote:did you take it seriously?



Deadly seriously.

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 5:33 am
by kc17
:shock: It all makes sense now...

PostPosted: Mon Mar 26, 2007 11:51 pm
by gdude335
such a simple example contradicts this.
You can have a mirror send the light far away and make a bright spot. Now when you suck the dark the mirror wouldnt reflect it.

PostPosted: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:12 pm
by Stone Fox
That's 5 mins and a lot of brain cells I'll never get back. :cry:

PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2007 1:20 pm
by CheeZee
Im sorry ..but this thread has exceeded its shelf life and shall now be locked .. due to it " Dark Sucking & Blowing at the same time :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: