pmcaero wrote:no it doesn't. Chess is still very limited in scope and number of choices. Machine Learning applied to real world data still has a ways to go before it appears remotely intelligent. It's useful for some limited subsets - the so-called specialized AIs - but will not pass for human for decades to come.
I think it depends on your definition of "intelligence". Some people believe that a vending machine possesses a limited form of intelligence. I think in the realm of chess Alpha Zero shows the highest level of intelligence--no human can defeat it, no computer program, as far as I know, can defeat it. The question I have is whether Alpha Zero can learn to consistently defeat a human playing against it with the aid of a powerful chess engine. I'd love to see Magnus Carlsen play 100 games against it while using Stockfish 8 to aid him in choosing his moves. Would Alpha Zero be able to learn to defeat a combined human/machine intelligence? I think we'll probably get an answer to that question in the near future. As far as complexity goes, Alpha Zero breezed through learning chess, but an even more impressive achievement was its learning of Go. There are way more possibilities involved in a move in Go than there are in chess.