by Farno » Sun Dec 09, 2007 10:18 pm
by PapaW » Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:20 am
Farno wrote:My issue is how someone can supposedly have your Name, Phone Number, Address and Card Number without direct access to the Credit Card database or at least someone who has access.
by kitesurfer » Mon Dec 10, 2007 8:30 am
by xswind » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:22 am
by surf patrol » Mon Dec 10, 2007 9:57 am
kitesurfer wrote:No genuine credit card company or bank will ever ask you to give out any security infomation over the phone
by kitesurfer » Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:11 am
surf patrol wrote:kitesurfer wrote:No genuine credit card company or bank will ever ask you to give out any security infomation over the phone
They do, at least they did to me last week. They have to make sure they are speaking to the right person.
It can be a bit of a catch 22 really, they have to make sure they are talking to the right person and you have to be sure they are legit.
If ever in doubt do what I did last week when I was phoned by my bank's fraud dept about a dodgy transaction on my card. When you have finished with the phone call give a ring back to check that it was actually your bank that rang - ring via the switchboard number (not a number they left you to ring, it could be any number) - this way you can guarantee that you will be talking to someone at your bank. Check that they actually rang you - they will have the details on you account.
by Stone Fox » Mon Dec 10, 2007 11:22 am
by xswind » Mon Dec 10, 2007 7:18 pm
by Stone Fox » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:25 am
xswind wrote:Actually Norton is a very good product and does a pretty good job, true not the best out there but defo towards the top of the rankings for effective protection as is detailed in many independent "in-the trade" reviews prove.
by RJD » Tue Dec 11, 2007 2:36 am
by kitesurfer » Tue Dec 11, 2007 8:06 am
Stone Fox wrote:xswind wrote:Actually Norton is a very good product and does a pretty good job, true not the best out there but defo towards the top of the rankings for effective protection as is detailed in many independent "in-the trade" reviews prove.
ummm..... you don't work in IT do you?
by xswind » Tue Dec 11, 2007 11:41 am
by kitesurfer » Tue Dec 11, 2007 1:00 pm
Stone Fox wrote:xswind wrote:Actually Norton is a very good product and does a pretty good job, true not the best out there but defo towards the top of the rankings for effective protection as is detailed in many independent "in-the trade" reviews prove.
ummm..... you don't work in IT do you?
Or do you work for symantec?
Norton is fleshing terrible.
Seriously. Scroogle it, and listen to just about every person who can find a hard drive with two hands and a flash light simultaneously screaming in terror, then being silenced.
by Stone Fox » Tue Dec 11, 2007 7:54 pm
by xswind » Wed Dec 12, 2007 9:22 am
Stone Fox wrote:I'm not keen on McAfee either. They're both ineffective, bloated and badly written shite by huge companies that spend more on their marketing than they're product.
They're between them responsible for a HUGE percentage of all connection problems and / or support calls. I feel sorry for the millions of people (and XSwind is right, they number in their MILLIONS) who have to use it because of company policy.
by Stone Fox » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:36 pm
xswind wrote:lol, The uniformed always make me laugh.
xswind wrote:Firewalls and antivirus programs by thier very nature have to restrict in order to be effective, if they did not the doors would be wide open.
xswind wrote:Can you tell what I do for a living?
by Stone Fox » Wed Dec 12, 2007 2:40 pm
by xswind » Thu Dec 13, 2007 8:53 am
9 hours ago by Kulharin3 comments
10 days ago by Swimmy Tim5 comments
11 days ago by BaNZ3 comments
17 days ago by BoMan6 comments
20 days ago by hannaconner5 comments
1 month ago by BaNZ4 comments
1 month ago by HaoleKook4 comments
1 month ago by Jimgem2 comments