by boardofwork » Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:24 am
by isaluteyou » Thu Apr 26, 2007 6:37 am
by PapaW » Thu Apr 26, 2007 7:05 am
by thaya » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:29 am
by libby » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:35 am
by paulS » Thu Apr 26, 2007 10:51 am
PapaWoolacombe wrote:Depennds on how youlook at things... negative or positive... tho of course it is increabaly niave to belive that there isn' anything wrong with the world..
Personally I'm always in aw of my surrounings, fasinated with how things interact and change/work etc... becuase its truly IS wonderful. The not so wonderful part is of course our presence... Humans.
by tomcat360 » Thu Apr 26, 2007 12:53 pm
PapaWoolacombe wrote:
Personally I'm always in aw of my surrounings, fasinated with how things interact and change/work etc... becuase its truly IS wonderful. The not so wonderful part is of course our presence... Humans.
by Real Pol » Thu Apr 26, 2007 1:04 pm
by tomcat360 » Thu Apr 26, 2007 2:37 pm
by jethrodog » Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:14 pm
by CheeZee » Thu Apr 26, 2007 3:28 pm
I think he should keep this atheist thing to shagging Mrs Garrison
.. what .. the who .. and the how now !?! .. " darhlin if your smut talk is on par with the above thenWhen reading Richard Dawkins, might also be wise to see if you can get hold of a paper called 'The Spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian Paradigm: A critique of the adaptationist programme' by Steven Gould and Richard Lewontin, published in 1979. Dawkins is brilliant, but he's perhaps a little too overly 'adaptationist' from an evolutionary biologists perspecitve......
4 hours ago by JamesHsouthaus7 comments
3 days ago by Kulharin3 comments
13 days ago by Swimmy Tim5 comments
14 days ago by BaNZ3 comments
20 days ago by BoMan6 comments
22 days ago by hannaconner5 comments
1 month ago by BaNZ4 comments
1 month ago by HaoleKook4 comments