by HaoleKook » Wed May 17, 2023 10:38 pm
Sharp trailing edges are more responsive, blunt trailing edges are smoother (forgiving and user-friendly as mentioned above.)
Water flowing along a surface and coming off a sharp edge continues to travel straight, so all the flow is in the direction of the fin and thus it's very responsive. With a blunt edge, turbulence and recirculation forms behind the fin and the water separates from the fin a little earlier, so some water is now moving in directions other than along the fin thus decreasing responsiveness, and increasing drag as mentioned.
Imagine a big airplane: it needs an enormous rudder for a worst-case scenario turn, however, moving that giant rudder even just a little creates tons of force and makes the plane feel unstable during normal flight. By thickening the trailing edge it becomes much less sensitive around neutral, but at full deflection still has 97+ % effectiveness. This would answer the question "why not just use a smaller fin?"
I would say (as an aerospace engineer) that at the speeds we surf at, leading edge shape is less of a factor. Water approaching a fin usually coming from some side angle, not directly inline with the fin. The shape of the leading edge has to do with how much of an 'angle of attack' you can maintain without fluid separating off the fin. On an airplane with less viscosity and much higher speeds this really matters. Surfing in much more viscous water and at lower speeds the water will have much more tendency to 'stick' to the fin at a range of angles. And the difference in drag would be negligible.