San Onofre Radioactive Waste Meetings

I saw this story and thought it was worth passing on.
http://www.worldsurfleague.com/posts/25 ... te-storage
http://www.worldsurfleague.com/posts/25 ... te-storage
Welcome to Surfing Waves Forum. Surfing related chat, discussion and information.
https://surfing-waves.com/forum/
Big H wrote:I'm not an expert but it would seem that there would be a more suitable, less volatile location where real estate was cheaper (maybe the real estate around that area is toast already.....probably, who wants all of that in their backyard).
Nuclear waste buried next to the ocean in an active fault line area in the shadows of 8.3m people = short term thinking I would venture to say.......
RinkyDink wrote:Would you be willing to let them transport 3.6 million pounds of radioactive waste along your neighborhood freeway or railroad track, past your daughter's elementary school, your wife's nail salon, and through Orange County or San Diego County to some other community? Oh yeah, and they would be doing that for the next year or however long it takes to move 3.6 million pounds of something, say, 200 miles away.
Oldie wrote:RinkyDink wrote:Would you be willing to let them transport 3.6 million pounds of radioactive waste along your neighborhood freeway or railroad track, past your daughter's elementary school, your wife's nail salon, and through Orange County or San Diego County to some other community? Oh yeah, and they would be doing that for the next year or however long it takes to move 3.6 million pounds of something, say, 200 miles away.
In Europe, this is common practice, and waste had been transported across countries for reprocessing for many years stopped now). But also globally there are plans for international repositories. Security for those nuclear waste trains is a nightmare, but it makes sense to store the waste in the most suitable locations rather than in high risk areas.