Page 1 of 2
Biggest wave

Posted:
Fri Jan 28, 2005 4:26 am
by duhkine
Whats the biggest wave you ever surfed?

Posted:
Fri Jan 28, 2005 7:01 am
by babyboarder89
not very. is the answer to that.

Posted:
Fri Jan 28, 2005 12:52 pm
by PapaW
Scored a reef up her ein North Wales that was peeking well over 10ft, pretty crazy but sweet!
Had a few big seshes at combesgate that have been over 10 too.

Posted:
Fri Jan 28, 2005 8:27 pm
by Broosta
...erm define 'surfed'

.
If by that you mean 'was mostly upright and in the vacinity of', then 10ft+.

Posted:
Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:09 am
by duhkine
I mean caught and stood on and got a good ride off of it and didn't wipeout on.

Posted:
Sat Jan 29, 2005 12:35 pm
by Aloha
I caught a cracker this afternoon

I don't know what size it was but it sure was a long waaaaaaaaaay down. Probably 12 ft as I've been on top of 12' foot vert skateboarding ramps and it was similar view but seemed scarier as ramps don't pitch over and try to drown you.
I don't know if it was my biggest but it sure was fun, I messed up the ride with a crap turn further on and it killed my speed and I lost the wave, which was just as well because if I had taken it all the way in I would have trouble getting out through all that white water again.
Here is an example of 12' vert it looks rather tame from below.


Posted:
Sat Jan 29, 2005 10:38 pm
by surferdude_scarborough
probably 5 or 6 ft at polzeath last summer. im not massively good on judging waves sizes i just surf what comes at me!

Posted:
Sun Jan 30, 2005 12:52 am
by oslo
13 feet, measured from behind ;)

Posted:
Sun Jan 30, 2005 3:13 pm
by southcoaster
did about a six foot wave before that was great, but ill leave all this big wave surfing for you guys! ill just stick to my 3 foot babies!!

Posted:
Sun Jan 30, 2005 6:39 pm
by k mac

Posted:
Tue Feb 01, 2005 6:40 am
by Aloha
oslo wrote:13 feet, measured from behind

Yeah that's why I had to post that stupid ramp picture as there are different interpretations of what 12 foot actually is. I think most surfers from around where I'm from would call that a 6 foot wave.
I don't know why becuase the face is 12 foot and that's the part you ride and the distance you would fall if you tipped over the lip.


Posted:
Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:59 am
by deathfrog
but that includes the trough, so the face is technacly only like six feet high, but then there is a big depression infront of it which makes it seem like more.
I tink.... but I also read if you took a six foot wave from hawaii and stuck it in florida, they would call it a ten footer, in socal it would be an eight footer, in mexico it would be a seven footer, and in norcal it would be six and a half...

Posted:
Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:11 pm
by oslo
The whole "measured from behind"-thing originates from Hawaii. When surfing was getting very popular in Hawaii, the folks that did the forecast startet to measure from behind. This resulted in less surfers showing up at the spots, because when the report said it was 3 foot waves, pepole didn't bother to show up. But when they reported 10 foot surf, people showed up. Problem was that the wave was in fact 16-18 foot, and people got hammered. That put an end to it, and now the proper way to measure it, is from the front

Posted:
Sun Feb 13, 2005 3:15 am
by meister
southcoaster wrote:did about a six foot wave before that was great, but ill leave all this big wave surfing for you guys! ill just stick to my 3 foot babies!!
amen 2 that!!
tried a 10ft face once, got absolutely smashed and vowed 2 leave those 2 the pros!!
Re: Biggest wave

Posted:
Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:33 am
by surfingirl
never surfed


Posted:
Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:16 am
by meister
oslo wrote:The whole "measured from behind"-thing originates from Hawaii. When surfing was getting very popular in Hawaii, the folks that did the forecast startet to measure from behind. This resulted in less surfers showing up at the spots, because when the report said it was 3 foot waves, pepole didn't bother to show up. But when they reported 10 foot surf, people showed up. Problem was that the wave was in fact 16-18 foot, and people got hammered. That put an end to it, and now the proper way to measure it, is from the front
wow i never knew that


Posted:
Tue Feb 15, 2005 3:16 pm
by drowningbitbybit
Got scared and bottled out of a 12ft barrel last year... Been kicking myself since....


Posted:
Tue Feb 15, 2005 4:28 pm
by k mac
[qoute]Got scared and bottled out of a 12ft barrel last year[/Got scared and bottled out of a 12ft barrel last year [/qoute] (':shock') i think you did the same as the best of us would of done .

Posted:
Tue Feb 15, 2005 7:18 pm
by Broosta
When surfing was getting very popular in Hawaii, the folks that did the forecast startet to measure from behind. This resulted in less surfers showing up at the spots, because when the report said it was 3 foot waves, pepole didn't bother to show up. But when they reported 10 foot surf, people showed up. Problem was that the wave was in fact 16-18 foot, and people got hammered. That put an end to it, and now the proper way to measure it, is from the front
Sounds like complete bollox to me. And if it is true it didn't f work did it!


Posted:
Wed Feb 16, 2005 2:06 am
by duhkine
The Surf News Network which is Hawaii based still measures the Hawaiian way. That network is the best resource to any surfer in Hawaii and many still believe in that system and use it. [url]Surf-news.com[/url] is the site for the Surf News Network. They also have a phone number with a recording on surf conditions twice a day. I still think Hawaiian measurements are strong in Hawaii even if the local news channels don't measure that way.