NSP 9'2'' review

The Longboarders only forum.

Re: NSP 9'2'' review

Postby oxenboy » Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:58 am

Greetings,
Which NSP long board variant are you talkinv about. I am 45yrs old and weigh 98kg. I am looking for a good starting board? I can see different NSP, Elements etc. Which is the bettrr model? What size should I buy 9.2?
thanks in adcance
oxenboy
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 6:49 am

Re: NSP 9'2'' review

Postby pingisik » Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:26 pm

oxenboy wrote:Greetings,
Which NSP long board variant are you talkinv about. I am 45yrs old and weigh 98kg. I am looking for a good starting board? I can see different NSP, Elements etc. Which is the bettrr model? What size should I buy 9.2?
thanks in adcance


Surfed NSP cocomat 9'2", weigh about 200lbs (91KG) , loved it. Broke recently in some heavy waves but I beat the $@#@ out of it.

Board choice really depends on where you surf and what the waves are like. Generally, I would go a little longer if you are a beginner(9'6" or 10'2"). It will help you glide more in small surf. This gives you more time to catch the wave and to pop up. However, if your waves are steep and pounding then a long board can be a huge pain. A long board in heavy surf is tough to handle.

I don't know all the differences between the various models. I would get an epoxy board that is rated to be very durable as you will likely make a lot of mistakes with the board when you are beginning and the epoxy generally takes a beating. I think the E+ line is supposed to be durable.

Hope that helps.
pingisik
New Member
 
Posts: 1
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 5:15 pm

Re: NSP 9'2'' review

Postby 312T4 » Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:20 am

Hello,
sorry I haven't been hear for a while.
My review refers to the old epoxy model, before the Element series. That was back in 2011.

Now, I think the bamboo model is a bit less strong, while all the others should be pretty similar. In terms of shape they should be exactly the same.

Something that I can add here is that the fin system was not FCS and probably still isn't.
The bottom of the board is flat. There's a bit of concave on the nose but not much. Rails are round 60/40 and hard near the tail.

It was very intuitive in terms of weight distribution (moving forward/backward).
I sold it less than a year ago to a 60yo guy who got his stolen!

I still think it's a good board for beginners and I would never tell a beginner to talk to a local shaper for the first surfboard.
A beginner simply doesn't know what he/she needs and what he/she likes.

Now in my 7th year of surfing I've 2 very different longboards that need completely different approaches. But I can 'feel' them and enjoy them now. It would have been impossible in 2011.
312T4
Local Hero
 
Posts: 129
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2012 5:30 am

Re: NSP 9'2'' review

Postby waikikikichan » Thu Oct 25, 2018 5:52 am

312T4 wrote:Something that I can add here is that the fin system was not FCS and probably still isn't.
The fins boxes on NSP's are now FCS twin tab.
User avatar
waikikikichan
Surf God
 
Posts: 4788
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:35 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Previous

Similar topics

Return to Longboarders Only