Volume versus length question

The shortboard only forum.

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Big H » Fri Jul 24, 2015 12:49 am

Depends on how big you are too....OMS you aren't a small guy....relatively speaking a 5'2" person vs a 6'2" person will have different perspectives on what is "short"....same goes for a 60kg person vs a 90kg person....
User avatar
Big H
Surf God
 
Posts: 3408
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:40 pm
Location: Bali

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby oldmansurfer » Fri Jul 24, 2015 1:16 am

Of course there are preferences but the industry is set up to sell shortboards along the scale of what the pros use when most surfers would be happier with longer boards at least at first.
So what is worse.... dying or regretting it for the rest of my life? Obviously I chose not regretting it.
User avatar
oldmansurfer
Surf God
 
Posts: 8193
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:10 pm
Location: Kauai

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Big H » Fri Jul 24, 2015 3:51 am

There was an Indonesian cat, about 35yers old and 60kg surfing a bodyboard at the break yesterday. Standing that is. Was getting a little run on it but not too far before bogging out. Still impressive though.
User avatar
Big H
Surf God
 
Posts: 3408
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:40 pm
Location: Bali

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Tudeo » Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:36 am

dtc wrote:There are two ways of looking at this - the DBB theory, which is that more volume is (up to a point) never a disadvantage. And the decrepit old man theory (which I have made up since I am also 45), which is that you pretty much have only a few years left to surf shorter boards - if you haven't surfed a 5-9 by the time you are 50 or so, chances are you will never be able to (properly) surf a 5-9...


I think I combined both approaches when buying the Addvance 606, I'm 52 (6ft,73kg). I was seriously thinking of buying a longboard but then thought I can do that later when I'm too old and unfit to surf the shorter boards.

Before that I was using a 7'9" malibu shape. I could catch a lot of waves with it but I wanted more dynamic surfing. Next being shorter my Add also weighs only about 4kg, what is a *lot* lighter then my 7'9". Altogether I can still do easy cruising and even walk halfway up the nose when the wave flattens, but now I can also do more radical moves.

But before everything u must be able to catch the waves also when competing in crowds. For this reason I advise everybody to get the shortest and lowest volume board u can paddle. Of Course u must sit more inside in the lineup to catch ur waves, and to give this old man time to get to his feet first :mrgreen:
Death is coming to Brooklyn. And it's got buck teeth and a cotton tail!
User avatar
Tudeo
SW Pro
 
Posts: 838
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 6:52 am
Location: Bali

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Big H » Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:17 am

Surf canggu and it doesn't matter if you are up or not unfortunately.
User avatar
Big H
Surf God
 
Posts: 3408
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2015 5:40 pm
Location: Bali

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Tudeo » Fri Jul 24, 2015 5:38 am

Big H wrote:Surf canggu and it doesn't matter if you are up or not unfortunately.


Shouting helps sometimes :lol:

Btw. that clip of Devon Howard on the Surfsimply page is just beautiful. I like this flowing style so much more than that aggressive WSL style.

Interesting to see him move only his back foot, back for carving and forward for acceleration. The front foot never left it's position the whole clip.
Death is coming to Brooklyn. And it's got buck teeth and a cotton tail!
User avatar
Tudeo
SW Pro
 
Posts: 838
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 6:52 am
Location: Bali

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby waikikikichan » Fri Jul 24, 2015 6:06 am

Tudeo wrote:
dtc wrote: I was seriously thinking of buying a longboard but then thought I can do that later when I'm too old and unfit to surf the shorter boards.


Whoa, wait a minute. What did you just say ?
User avatar
waikikikichan
Surf God
 
Posts: 4783
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:35 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby jaffa1949 » Fri Jul 24, 2015 7:17 am

Never mind the width feel the length!
Uncle Jaffa rides boards that enable him to ride a this best, no longer short! ( oxymorons) .
There is no debate ride what you can ride best, try driving with a putter!

DTC are you trying to evoke a response from a plaintiff there?
Ride long on a good day and you won't be caught under the short and curly ! :lol:
I've taken up troll hunting just for fun, instead of a rifle I'll just use a pun! 冲浪爷爷
User avatar
jaffa1949
Surfing Legend
 
Posts: 8179
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:01 am
Location: The super secret point breaks of Ober Österreich ( how many will notice the change)

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby dtc » Fri Jul 24, 2015 8:09 am

:shock: That wasn't my quote. Something to do with the quote marks

I'm all for longer boards. Never surfed a board shorter than I am and almost certainly never will.
dtc
Surf God
 
Posts: 3833
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon May 21, 2012 4:58 am

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby waikikikichan » Fri Jul 24, 2015 8:31 am

i pressed the quote button on Tudeo's comment. But no worries all around. I just thought it sounded funny if it's interpreted as "Longboards are for old out of shape surfers". It is interesting hearing all the talk about volume when my board is about 70 + liters ( being 5'2" 54 kg )
User avatar
waikikikichan
Surf God
 
Posts: 4783
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:35 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Tudeo » Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:34 am

waikikikichan wrote:I just thought it sounded funny if it's interpreted as "Longboards are for old out of shape surfers"


Ah, sorry for that :oops:

I didn't want to say that as a general statement, It was(is) just my line of thinking. In the last few years I already lost a lot of fitness, I want to get as much stoke as possible in the limited time I have left surfing. I get more of that surfing shorter boards, that's all.

And I can only hope to fall back onto longboards when the time comes that I cannot catch waves on shorter boards anymore. Hmm.. I'm not sure if this post helps, anyway just my humble opinion :lol:

Btw. my Addvance packs 48l in 6'6" lenght, I wouldnt go so far as saying its a small board :lol:
Death is coming to Brooklyn. And it's got buck teeth and a cotton tail!
User avatar
Tudeo
SW Pro
 
Posts: 838
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Fri May 08, 2015 6:52 am
Location: Bali

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby jaffa1949 » Fri Jul 24, 2015 12:45 pm

Uncle Jaffa is 6ft weights a100kg so like all humans about 75% water that gives an approximate volume at about 80 litres And he can body surf he is a twin fin with round tail and a broken nose.
His equipment was shaped in the first half of the last century and has seen better days but he still gets it out in the ocean at regular intervals.
I've taken up troll hunting just for fun, instead of a rifle I'll just use a pun! 冲浪爷爷
User avatar
jaffa1949
Surfing Legend
 
Posts: 8179
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:01 am
Location: The super secret point breaks of Ober Österreich ( how many will notice the change)

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby Swimmy Tim » Fri Jul 24, 2015 4:34 pm

It's a good debate, short long fat, whatever. If you haven't seen this article, many of the best selling shorboards in the world right now are the higher volume models (CI Average Joe, Hayden Hypto-Crypto, Firewire Dominator, Lost RV). I think the general trend these days is more volume on shortboards, even the performance elite have moved away slightly from the taco chips flogged by Slater et al back in the day.

http://stabmag.com/the-10-best-selling- ... s-of-2014/

As far as longboards go, no doubt they're capable high performance, same with SUP for that matter --- go to Hawaii if you haven't seen for yourself. Some serious rippers there.
User avatar
Swimmy Tim
New Member
 
Posts: 12
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Sat Nov 10, 2012 3:06 am

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby oldmansurfer » Fri Jul 24, 2015 9:36 pm

I guess it doesn't amaze me that people want to buy what the pros use even though they won't get the same results. There is a disposable mentality about surfboards now also. They are made so light that there is no way they will survive for long. There is some eco concious goal that pro surfers should deal with..... how to recycle boards or to get boards made that do what they want but aren't disposable (don't break easily and regularly) or get boards made that can be recycled. I get boards made that will last for a long time. I don't go through 200 boards a year and may still be using all my boards for years to come if I can still physically use them LOL
So what is worse.... dying or regretting it for the rest of my life? Obviously I chose not regretting it.
User avatar
oldmansurfer
Surf God
 
Posts: 8193
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:10 pm
Location: Kauai

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby drowningbitbybit » Fri Jul 24, 2015 10:59 pm

jaffa1949 wrote:There is no debate ride what you can ride best

As long as "best" is defined as "having the most fun" and not "can do a certain trick" or "can ride the furthest" :D
You'll probably find me surfing, but if not, I'll probably be in the photography studio
User avatar
drowningbitbybit
Surfing Legend
 
Posts: 6459
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2005 11:16 am
Location: Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby jaffa1949 » Sat Jul 25, 2015 1:07 am

drowningbitbybit wrote:
jaffa1949 wrote:There is no debate ride what you can ride best

As long as "best" is defined as "having the most fun" and not "can do a certain trick" or "can ride the furthest" :D

Definitely
I've taken up troll hunting just for fun, instead of a rifle I'll just use a pun! 冲浪爷爷
User avatar
jaffa1949
Surfing Legend
 
Posts: 8179
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2010 12:01 am
Location: The super secret point breaks of Ober Österreich ( how many will notice the change)

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby oldmansurfer » Sat Jul 25, 2015 5:00 pm

DBB I wasn't talking about you LOL well I see these guys surfing with these short boards having trouble catching the waves and they are young fit guys and me out of shape overweight old man is catching the waves they can't catch cause I am surfing a board a couple feet longer than their board.
So what is worse.... dying or regretting it for the rest of my life? Obviously I chose not regretting it.
User avatar
oldmansurfer
Surf God
 
Posts: 8193
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:10 pm
Location: Kauai

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby IanCaio » Sat Jul 25, 2015 6:51 pm

Well, I am with you DBBB. Not everyone rides a shortboard because it's what the pros ride. For me it's what was available and what I could carry inside a bus.
Sometimes I feel a little "terrorism" over shortboards, like people only ride because it's what the pros are seem with. I know there are lots of people that get ahead of themselfs or just try to look cool with a shortboard, but there are people who ride them for different reasons.

The age and board size talk reminded me, on my last session I was for a while beside a sir who seemed over 60, shredding on a shortboard! Really cool :D
User avatar
IanCaio
Local Hero
 
Posts: 478
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2014 10:08 pm

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby oldmansurfer » Sat Jul 25, 2015 7:30 pm

More specifically about length and volume this is my uneducated thoughts. Volume is important in the way the board floats you so ideally the volume would be right below your weight as you paddle as there is less benefit to volume that is in front or behind you. More volume will make it more difficult to duck dive. A longer board will get more push from the wave as you paddle for it depending on shape but given the same basic shape a longer board will get into waves easier even if they have the same volume. Once you get moving volume has little to do with the way the board handles unless you are going very slow but length can affect it in terms of more weight in front of the part of the board that contacts the water in turns. A really shortboard will be burried in a hard turn but the same hard turn on a longer board will have the same mount of the board buried and the longer portion sticking out over the water. This requires more force to run and slows down the process. So volume isn't too much of a concern except how it affects your paddling and duck diving.
So what is worse.... dying or regretting it for the rest of my life? Obviously I chose not regretting it.
User avatar
oldmansurfer
Surf God
 
Posts: 8193
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Mon Aug 12, 2013 9:10 pm
Location: Kauai

Re: Volume versus length question

Postby oldenglish » Fri Jul 31, 2015 1:35 am

I'm gonna chime in here.

First, in regards to the joe. The board carries a ton of volume for its length. I have a friend who recently bought a 6'1 maybe a 6'0. I'm 5'9 close to 190 and the volume felt a bit excessive. It caught waves very well and paddled well. I think as long as you have some experience getting up on a shortboard and making your own speed you will be fine going shorter. The board was so big that pushing on it hard for speed pumps caused it to slide out. It probably needed bigger fins in but was definitely way oversized (I will get into this later).


Volume Vs. Length, is not as simple as it sounds. Length adds glide. Just like when swimming. Extension of arms and lengthening the vessel helps cruise and maintain speed. Longer short boards are often easier to paddle even if lower in volume than short stubby grovel boards. They take fewer strokes to get up to speed and continue to maintain their speed much longer.

So how does the high volume but very short board help you on smaller waves? Once you have caught the wave it is easier to continue planeing. Less work making speed turns and milking the pocket than on a foiled out shortboard. In laymans terms it sinks a lot slower than a high performance shape. Also the reduced length allows a good surfer to fit more turns in on shorter smaller waves. This is the opposite for longer high performance short boards where you have a much lower volume usually due to foil (thin thin rails). The hpsb usually uses a lot more rail for turns allowing larger drawn out turns that work a lot better in waves offering a bigger canvas to draw your line where sinking is not a problem and control of speed becomes more important than creating speed.


In regards to length, these boards are shaped to be ridden very short. Over volumed and these boards generally get hard to control since they are very wide with full rails. This is why people generally ride larger fins on thick and wide boards in order to keep them tied down to the water.

If it were me, I would consider my ability to ride a board 3-4 inches shorter than me. If I doubt my ability to surf that short of a board I would look at finding a board made to be ridden at the length I'm considering and not try to ride a board in a way that goes against the shapers recommendations.
oldenglish
Local Hero
 
Posts: 109
Likes: 0 post
Liked in: 0 post
Joined: Wed Aug 10, 2011 3:38 am

PreviousNext

Similar topics

Return to Shortboarders Only